Same rules, every roster
One standard on every campaign, whoever wrote the prompt and whichever client it's for.
Your AI writes for every client on the roster. One "Loved your recent post!" lands on the wrong prospect and it's your client's name on it, not yours.
MailDignity checks every email between your generation step and the send queue. Before it goes out.
Hi Stefan,
I loved your posts!generic_flattery We help companies in your market grow.
You're losing clients because your tools are a mess.unsolicited_diagnosis
Can we meet tomorrow at 14:00?asymmetric_ask
Agency operators talking about AI outbound on Reddit this year. They aren't MailDignity customers. They're describing the job it does.
"We experimented with it on our own outbound but we never use it for clients. AI SDRs still write stuff that's way too obvious to be AI, or they personalize on something that has nothing to do with the offer, like congratulating someone on a podcast episode before pitching."
Agency operator, r/gtmengineering
"Everyone sends polished emails now. Every agency. Every AI tool. Every template floating around on twitter produces the same clean structured tone."
Runs outbound for 47 companies, r/b2bemailing
"The 'loved your post about X' opener became a tell the moment everyone's tool could generate it, and readers pattern-match fast."
Outbound operator, r/b2bmarketing
Every check comes back as a structured verdict with the exact line, the reason and a rewrite. These three are MailDignity's own examples.
Hi Stefan, I saw Growth Agency's recent technical SEO case study. We built a shared inbox for agency teams to keep client requests in one place. Would a short overview be useful?
{
"verdict": "PASS",
"summary": "Specific, short and easy to decline. Ship it.",
"issues": []
}One standard on every campaign, whoever wrote the prompt and whichever client it's for.
Structured JSON on every email, so you decide what a PASS, a REVIEW and a FAIL each do next.
Make, Clay, n8n, Zapier, or anywhere you can send an HTTP request. Works via MCP with your agent. Docs
Deterministic filters with fixed rules go first. Only then do AI layers read the message and its context.
Flags unasked diagnoses and private-life prying. Don't stop the conversation before it starts.
[ unsolicited_diagnosis · privacy_intrusion ]Catches empty flattery and copy-paste clichés. No more fake familiarity and guilt-trip nudges.
[ generic_flattery · fake_familiarity ]No cold Calendly grabs, no homework. One small step tied to the offer.
[ asymmetric_ask · homework ]→ A guardrail, not a snoop: it judges the form of the message, not facts it can't see.
Deliverability gets the email in. SPF, DKIM and warm-up get it past the filters. Then a human reads it, and that's the part your client is paying you for.
Yearly is $2,490, two months free. Cancel any time. Bigger engine? Enterprise is $599 for 500,000 checks. See all plans
No. You already have plenty of writers. MailDignity checks, reviews and fixes the outbound they produce: fixed-rule filters first, AI layers after.
SPF, DKIM and warm-up get emails past the filters. Then a human reads, and spots AI slop in a heartbeat. This is the layer for that human.
It's one API call between the generation prompt and the send queue. From code or a no-code stack (Make, Clay, n8n, Zapier), and via MCP with your agent.
No. It's a guardrail, not a snoop: it judges the form of the message, not facts it can't see.
Yes. Paste any client email into the free playground and see how it lands. Plans are monthly or yearly and cancel any time.
Protect their domains, treat their prospects like peers, and keep the account.