[ HANDBOOK ] / MAILDIGNITY + LAVENDER

A good score is not a respectful email.

Keep using an email coach if it helps your reps write. MailDignity answers a different question: will this message make a stranger feel used? It runs as an API check before sending, for humans and AI alike.

Two different jobs.

Lavender · coach / score

Length and reading level
Subject line and personalization hints
Writing coaching inside the inbox

MailDignity · gate

Asymmetric asks and pressure
Fake familiarity and generic flattery
Guilt-trip follow-ups and fake urgency
A PASS / REVIEW / FAIL gate with a rewrite

Different question, different moment.

An email score helps a writer polish a draft. MailDignity sits after the draft, as a gate: it can stop or repair a message before your sending tool ships it, without a person in the loop.

Why the relational check matters more at scale.

A short, readable email can still demand 30 minutes from a stranger or pretend a friendship that does not exist. At volume, those patterns turn into spam reports and burned domains. A number does not catch them; named boundaries do.

Built for pipelines, not only people.

MailDignity works through a REST API, an MCP server for ChatGPT and Claude, Gmail and Outlook add-ons and no-code tools like Clay, Zapier, Make and n8n.

Example.

> Hey Sarah! Loved your last post, you are clearly a visionary. Got 30 min tomorrow to see how we 10x your pipeline?
 
Lavender: Short and readable, so a length or readability score can rate it well.
[REVIEW] generic flattery and an asymmetric ask. Rewrite keeps the offer and lowers the ask.

FAQ.

Is MailDignity a Lavender alternative?

No. It is a complementary check. Lavender-style coaching helps writing; MailDignity gates tone and respect before send.

Can I use both?

Yes. Write with your usual tools, then run the final text through MailDignity via API or add-on.

Try it.

Check an email in the playground · Explore the API

MAILDIGNITY + AI EMAIL WRITERS